TMI Tuesday: September 4, 2012 – Cum, are you a fan?

This week’s TMI Tuesday questions come from the wacky, inventive, and sexually creative mind of the late phoenix.

Jack’s Answers

1. We are all incurable sex addicts, but name one thing—a job, a passion, a creative outlet, a collection—of yours you use as a replacement, a distraction from constantly thinking about sex 24/7.
There is literally nothing that serves this purpose for me.  Make no mistake, I have a number of potential distractions, amongst them non-blog writing, reading, film, outdoor activities, cooking, and the day-to-day raising of my daughter.  But of these activities, absolutely none of them have managed to successfully distract me from thinking about sex for more than a couple minutes at the absolute most.  I kid you not, the typical thought in my head when I’m engaging in one of these activities is, “I wonder if I can somehow parlay this into getting laid.”

2. Have you ever loved somebody so much you thought having sex with them would actually sully the pristine purity of that love?
Of course. My mom.

Well, it would!
3. If you could make love to yourself, would you? Describe this experience in full detail.
I do frequently.  Generally speaking when I make love to myself, I light a candle and let it burn on my nightstand.  Then I put on some appropriate music on my mp3 player.  It’s soft, and frequently romantic.  Sometimes I put on my favorite slow jams playlist.  Then I get naked and lie down.  From that point, one of the following things happens:  I lose myself in a fantasy, typically involving Jill, one (or more) of our hot online friends, and/or someone we know in real life; or I peruse sexy blogs and Moby albums belonging to the aforementioned hot online friends.  That’s when the lovemaking begins in earnest.  I use the typical up-and-down motion on my shaft, though it is not unusual for me to stroke the engorged head of my cock with the palm of my hand.  This activity lasts until I am spent or interrupted.  Note that it’s the candle that makes it lovemaking.  Without the candle it’s just garden-variety jerking off.
4. Cum, are you a fan? Explain and expound.
My own cum?  Absolutely.  Huge fan.  For decades I’ve been proselytizing about the benefits of my cum – taste and skincare benefits paramount among them – to anyone who will listen.  Other guys’ cum?  No.  Other women’s cum?  Yes, especially Jill’s.  The taste tends to alternate between lime juice and buttered popcorn.
5. Does it creep you out to know that God is watching you as you’re fucking?  
No more than it does to know that Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, and the Tooth Fairy are watching.  I think you know exactly what I’m trying to say.

What I’m trying to say is that it would be totally hot.

Bonus: Tell us something sexy that happened to you this week.
Can’t think of a single thing, sadly.  It was a pretty unsexy week in the Jack and Jill household, the weekend especially.  Total bummer.  Maybe this week will be hotter…

Jill’s Answers

1. We are all incurable sex addicts, but name one thing—a job, a passion, a creative outlet, a collection—of yours you use as a replacement, a distraction from constantly thinking about sex 24/7.
I would say that my job is the one thing that usually prevents me from constantly thinking about sex.  I work with children, and that environment does not lend itself easily to sexual thought.  However, Jack being Jack, I frequently find myself the recipient of a variety of lewd text messages, emails, links, and photos via my phone.  He will do anything to redirect my mind to matters of a sexual nature.

2. Have you ever loved somebody so much you thought having sex with them would actually sully the pristine purity of that love?
No.  I’m pretty sure that, while I have dated many men, the only one I ever really loved is Jack.  By the time I realized how intense my feelings were, we had already had sex.  At any rate, at least in my experience I don’t believe that sex has to sully anything.  The love I feel for Jack makes the sex that we have more intense, and the sex makes our love stronger.  Being physically intimate is just another way for us to express our love.

3. If you could make love to yourself, would you? Describe this experience in full detail.
Yes, I would definitely make love to myself.  I’m hot.  Who wouldn’t make love to me?  I would start with a sensual massage to get myself in the mood.  Being touched all over my body excites me, and makes it easier for me to have an orgasm.  My hands would quickly be replaced by my lips and tongue.  After being kissed all over, I would desire something more intense.  Unfortunately I can’t fuck myself as I just don’t have the body parts for the job.  I would probably opt to use a strap-on cock or maybe a double-ended dildo.  If I could hold a vibrator on my clit at the same time, even better.  There have been times when I’ve had really good orgasms with just a vibrator on my clit, and they’re usually more intense when I’m getting fucked at the same time.

It’s a moot point, as cloning is out of my price range.

4. Cum, are you a fan? Explain and expound.
Yes!  I do consider myself a fan of cum.  I love it on my body, or in my mouth, but just not in my hair, please.  I especially love it when Jack cums inside me.  Sometimes when he does I like to masturbate so I can feel my cum and his mix on my fingertips.  Speaking of which, I love tasting my own cum too.  That counts, right?
5. Does it creep you out to know that God is watching you as you’re fucking? 
I’ve literally never given this any thought.  The thought of God watching me as I’m fucking, or changing clothes, or whatever, has never occurred to me.  But now that I think of it, there are probably millions of people fucking all over the world at any given moment.  I question whether God has the time to watch us fuck, despite His omnipotence.  However, I am sure that God is totally in favor of pleasure and happiness and that’s the epitome of sex so He’s not likely to be offended or anything.  Also, I love an audience while I’m getting fucked so that would probably turn me on, especially if He liked what he saw.

I think He would!

Bonus: Tell us something sexy that happened to you this week.
Jack and I had a threesome.  This week marks the birthday of M, our longtime friend and sometime third.  She happens to be single at the moment, so we figured, what better way to celebrate?  We had a nice dinner that was pretty much nonstop flirting and double-entendres.  Then we came home and opened a bottle of wine, and then a couple more.  I can’t even put into words how exciting it was to kiss and play with her.  It had been so long.  We hope it won’t be too long before it happens again.

How to play TMI Tuesday: Copy the above TMI Tuesday questions to your webspace (i.e., a blog). Answer the questions there, then leave a comment below, on this blog post, so we’ll all know where to read your responses. Please don’t forget to link to tmituesdayblog from your website!

Why No Porn-Watching American Should Ever Vote Republican*

Apostrophes:  Learn to use them!

It was revealed last week that, in addition to provisions limiting the rights of LGBT individuals and forcing the victims of rape to carry to term the children of their rapists, the 2012 Republican Party platform includes language promising the vigorous enforcement of current anti-pornography laws.

There are laws in place in the United States which make pornography illegal.  I’m not talking about relatively tame scenes involving a man and a woman having sex; while there are those who would love nothing better than to eradicate even the nearly-wholesome output of studios like Vivid Video, its mainstream appeal makes cracking down on vanilla porn (for lack of a better descriptor) a hard sell.  But I’m not talking solely about child pornography, either.  Since the presidency of George W. Bush, the adult industry has seen strict measures put in place to make their product more difficult to produce and distribute.

In 2001, fear of criminal prosecution led to the creation of the Cambria List, a collection of sex acts considered at the time to be obscene in the eyes of the U.S. Justice Department; it was strongly recommended that these acts not be included in pornographic films.  Today the items on the list seem arbitrary, nonsensical even, from such porn standards as facials, simulated rape, and degradation; to much less controversial elements such as food play and blindfolding.

Subsequently in 2005, an Obscenity Prosecution Task Force was founded by Attorney General Alberto Gonzales which was “dedicated to the investigation and prosecution of the distributors of hard-core pornography that meets the test for obscenity, as defined by the United States Supreme Court.”  
Let me repeat that.  The purpose of this entity is to persecute – sorry, prosecute – the makers of any porn deemed obscene by the United States Supreme Court.  Its purpose is not necessarily to lock up those who exploit minors, exhibit pornography in public places, or otherwise circumvent consent.  Its purpose is, essentially, to flout the First Amendment which guarantees the right of any individual with a video camera to film two or more consenting adults engaging in sex (or for that matter a single such individual masturbating) without worrying about the government locking him or her up.
I may think he’s a pig, but as long as his movies feature consenting adults being urinated on, he’s in the clear.

“Wait a minute, Jack”, you may be saying.  “The Founding Fathers didn’t have Three-in-the-Butt Sluts Volume 4 in mind when they drafted the Bill of Rights.  They were talking about the right of the individual to speak his or her mind, question the government, and protest peacefully.”  Hey, you know what?  You may be right.  But if we start nit-picking details and questioning the evolution of each amendment of the United States Constitution, i.e. what the authors had in mind versus the way it’s interpreted today, we couldn’t in good conscience bypass the fact that the Founding Fathers probably didn’t envision automatic weapons when they wrote the Second Amendment.

They didn’t envision them in her hands, anyway.

Beyond the obvious violation of our right to free speech, my problem with outlawing pornography based on such grounds is that there is no tangible societal standard of exactly what constitutes obscenity.  Barring the sort of lunacy that has Child Protective Services investigate parents who take photos of their babies naked on bear skin rugs, child pornography is almost universally understood to be the production of sexually-explicit materials featuring individuals younger than the local age of consent.  Provided that the age of consent doesn’t change, the definition of child pornography won’t either.
But obscenity?  That depends who you ask.  Like just about anything else, it’s a matter of perspective.  One person’s hardcore scat fetish video is another person’s obscenity.  However, one person’s trashy romance novel is another person’s obscenity.  One person’s hip-hop video is another person’s obscenity.  One person’s lingerie catalog is another person’s obscenity.  However, I opine that allowing some hand-wringing fringe group like One Million Moms to determine what is obscene and attempt to influence Americans to agree is different than allowing the government to decide.
While there may be laws in place against hardcore pornography, they are seldom enforced.  How could they be?  Such statutes are clearly unconstitutional.  But most if not all Republican politicians support them.  When Rick Santorum was campaigning for the Republican nomination earlier this year, he drew much derision for his position on pornography.  Calling it “a pandemic of harm”, Santorum claimed that pornography is toxic to marriages, and “contributes to misogyny and violence against women”.  
 

And we all know that Republicans take misogyny very seriously.

I’m guessing that most of the right-leaning voters who regularly indulge in pornography were relieved when Santorum closed up shop.  They likely plan to vote for Mitt Romney, who may still plan to enforce anti-pornography laws but isn’t half as outspoken about it as was Santorum.
In an interview with Huffington Post, Patrick Trueman, president of Morality in Media, stated that use of pornography among males in their twenties leads to sexual dysfunction.  According to Trueman, because young men spend so much time watching pornography they essentially become broken.  Said Trueman, “Normal sex is not something that gets them excited.”  And you know something?  I’m almost inclined to agree.

Before you unsubscribe from this blog in anger, hear me out:  An overreliance on pornography is probably not unlike an overreliance on anything, whether it be a trusty vibrator, your alarm clock, or your mother’s home cooking.  Once an individual becomes accustomed to something, it can be very difficult to get by without it.  If your dog greets you at the front door every day when you come home from work, something will feel amiss that one afternoon when Sparky misses your arrival because he’s out back burying a bone.
We’ve written about Death Grip Syndrome, the phenomenon that affects young men who’ve spent their entire post-pubescent lives masturbating with a tight grasp.  When they eventually have sexual intercourse, they find that their partner’s vagina and other orifices are nowhere near as tight as the grip they’ve been using.  As Trueman would say, the brain maps of these men have been altered.  At this point, re-training themselves may be the only way to correct years of irresponsible masturbation.
However, I don’t hear any faith-based non-profit groups advocating that some sort of proper masturbation curriculum be adopted in our public schools.  But why not?  It’s the exact same principle.  According to its opponents, pornography leads to sexual dysfunction.  By their standards, so too does death grip-style masturbation.  So why are they in favor of banning pornography but against teaching young men how to masturbate properly?  It’s a rhetorical question; obviously the answer is because while masturbation is something that virtually everyone does, it isn’t something that can be talked about or advocated for.  Hell, even liberal-ass Bill Clinton dismissed Surgeon General Joycelyn Elders for daring to suggest that masturbation be taught in school.
While I understand Trueman’s belief that overexposure to pornography may have negative consequences, I will never support any school of thought that suggests that human beings need to be protected from themselves.  I don’t care whether the issue is cities banning the sale of soft drinks – a currently-trending cause championed by the left – or the federal government banning more adult vices including alcohol, tobacco, gambling, and, yes, pornography.  Enforced deprivation has been proven insufficient to prevent demand; it’s also been responsible for dramatic spikes in organized crime.  
The fact is that while filmmakers like Max Hardcore have been accused of “testing the limits of acceptability” and deviating from the boundaries of taste, that shouldn’t have anything to do with the legality of their work.  No one should be using words like “acceptability” when talking about porn that involves consenting adults.  If some fundamentalist claims that Max Hardcore’s films are borderline unacceptable, are they then suggesting that the rest of the porn spectrum – that involving acts of arguably better taste – is acceptable?  I’d suggest that those who don’t like watching porn simply not watch it and stop trying to inflict their will upon the rest of us.
When any politician – a Republican especially – seems to be looking out for the best interests of the common man and woman, be very suspicious.  They aren’t against pornography because they want young men and women to live happy, monogamous, heterosexual lives together.  I’m pretty sure most Republican don’t give half a fuck about the common man and woman.  They are against pornography because they seek to legislate (and regulate) our very sexuality.  If they could, they would criminalize all non-procreative sexual behavior.  Especially yours.
-Jack
*We get political sometimes.  It happens.  It is our belief that one can’t run a sex blog in America without occasionally thinking – if not blogging – about politics.  It is not our intention to offend, but rather to drag the issue into the spotlight and, in doing so, to force our fellow American voters to take action.  If you don’t, you shouldn’t complain when you wake up one morning and discover that your rights have been taken away.

Sinful Sunday: A Teaser

On Saturday night we enjoyed a dinner date with a sexy friend.

The restaurant featured a lovely view. 

As soon as we got home the clothes came off…

…and a great time was had by all.
More to come next week!
See who else is being sinful at Molly’s Daily Kiss!
Sinful Sunday

Formspring Friday: Bonus Edition*

hey

Hey there.
Because even monosyllabic questions deserve an answer!  Ask us a sexy question on Formspring!
*Looking for our main Formspring post from earlier today?  It’s here.**

**Looking for our Flash Fiction Friday post from even earlier today?  It’s here.

Formspring Friday: Foreplay Friday

Could you be satisfied with just foreplay?
By definition, foreplay is any act or series of acts intended to create desire for sexual activity, i.e. intercourse; or which cause sexual arousal.  Foreplay is not necessarily an act or series of acts that leads to intercourse, though it may.  For the purposes of our answer, foreplay includes but is not limited to intimate touching, masturbation and mutual masturbation, kissing on the lips or other parts of the body, and oral sex.
In the event that one of us suffered a debilitating physical malady that prevented us from having penetrative sex, could we still be happy with the sex life that remained?  Could we maintain our sanity and our sunny dispositions were we, from this day forward, unable to ever again enjoy the manner of sexual pleasure that comes from being so physically close that we nearly share the same body?  It seems unlikely.
We might be satisfied with a drastic diminishment of the amount of intercourse provided that foreplay was allowed to take place, but we can’t imagine never having intercourse again.  We suppose we could stand being limited to foreplay 80% of the time provided that the remaining 20% of our sex life included penetrative sex.  We’re still relatively young; the thought of living the rest of our lives without fucking is a tunnel with no light at the end.
To be clear, we have an exciting and satisfying sex life.  We enjoy the foreplay that we have, but we have always seen it primarily as a precursor to penetrative sex.  Were we to be forever limited in this fashion, we would make the most of the situation.  We would more than likely never wind up unsatisfied physically.  Without the intimacy we derive from intercourse, however, emotional satisfaction may be lacking.

If you want to ask us a sexy question, drop us a line on Formspring, or use the handy Formspring widget on the right-hand side of our blog.  To see who else participated this week, visit Twitter and search for #FormspringFriday!  If you have a Formspring account and you aren’t already participating, feel free to join in the Formspring Friday fun!

Flash Fiction Friday: Trial of the Century

The case had electrified the media.  A young trophy wife stood accused of her husband’s murder.  The prosecutor was an up and comer, five years out of law school.  This was a career-making case, and some predicted a judgeship, others a bid for state legislature.  The state sought the ultimate penalty.  
The defense attorney was world-famous, known for defending corrupt CEOs from fraud charges and pro athletes from allegations of rape and assault.  His acquittal rate was staggering.  But the physical evidence found at the scene of the crime said his client wasn’t getting off this time.
The prosecutor was a different story, however.  In a private and highly unorthodox meeting in the judge’s chambers, he convinced the defendant to give him a reason to consider lenience.  Which is how the defendant found herself on her knees before the young crusader, skirt hiked past her knees to avoid scuff marks, blouse unbuttoned to her navel revealing breasts that threatened to spill over the top of her black bra.
His slacks were down, resting atop his expensive Italian loafers as she two-fisted his impressive cock.  She moved with great vigor, her life literally depending on her performance.  As he reached climax, she released her grip and leaned back.  The prosecutor aimed for her open mouth and stroked himself to completion.
Back in the courtroom, the defendant and the prosecutor returned to their respective tables.  The jury was called back in.
The prosecutor addressed the judge:  “Your honor, the People are willing to consider a plea bargain.” (255/255)
Behind the Scenes
This week saw no new Flash Fiction Friday prompt from either Ram the Sunlover or Insatiabear.  Therefore I decided to go into Ram’s archives and write a story based on the prompt from July 27, which I missed due to site downtime.  

The prompt photo seems to depict a courtroom scene, evidenced by the fact that the file name is “objection your honor”.  Obviously the sexy woman in the hat is the defendant, and I took the sunglasses-wearing gentleman on the left to be the “world-famous” defense attorney to which I refer in the second paragraph.  I’m not sure why he’s wearing sunglasses indoors.

The requirements for this particular challenge include the use of the phrase “…”two-fisted…”, and a maximum word count of 255.  I was aware of the required phrase as an expression meaning “virile” or “ready to fight”.  However, I think my usage fits the story nicely.  As for the word count, I originally brought the story in at 256, but changed the final sentence of the second paragraph from “…the physical evidence found at the scene of the crime said that his client wasn’t getting off this time” to “…the physical evidence found at the scene of the crime said his client wasn’t getting off this time.”

You can probably tell from my story that I know very little about the American justice system, save that it appears to be inherently flawed.  But I think I’ve watched enough television to write something serviceable.

Deleted Scenes

None.

Soundtrack

I like the way the dulcet sounds of the Five Keys’ early 1950s song “There Ought to Be a Law” plays against the unorthodox goings-on in the otherwise staid setting of this story.  On the other hand, “Guilty as Charged”, by early 1980s rock band Culprit, provides a nihilistic, fast-paced feel that fits the action well.  Either way, the familiar “banging gavel” sound effect from TV’s Law & Order should accompany the prosecutor’s climax.

The Naughty Hangout: Abridged

The main theme at The Naughty Hangout this week is “Bridge”.  We’ve done a couple photo posts involving a bridge, including a previous installment of TNH, and our final HNT post.  So we thought we’d skip the main theme and tackle one of the backup themes, either “Unfinished” or “Letting Go”.  In the end I couldn’t help but share this picture of the Golden Gate Bridge at dusk that I took a year or so ago.

If you mouse over the above picture you’ll see another image which represents “Unfinished”.  Jill and I were hoping to have sex once the baby was asleep, but as you can see, her work schedule has taken its toll on her.  We’ve got some unfinished business, wouldn’t you say?

See who else is being naughty this week!

Wicked Wednesday: The Homemade Dildo

I squeezed the bottle with both hands, but there was absolutely no give.  It was cold, too.  Ice cold.  Drops of moisture held fast to the outside, while the water on the inside had long since become solid.

“What do you think?” I asked him.

“It’s been in there for four hours.  It’s as frozen as it’s going to get.”

I got a couple towels from the rack in the bathroom and lay them down on the bed.  “Let’s do this, then.”

Jack tried using a pair of scissors first, but it proved too difficult to cut into the plastic with them.  The mouth of the bottle was too thick, or maybe it was the angle.  At any rate, the ice within made it near impossible to start cutting, not without ruining our new toy.

“Want to get a knife from the kitchen?” I asked him.  He shook his head.  In his nightstand drawer was a pocket knife.  He unfolded it and ran the blade along the bottle’s surface.  A few back-and-forth motions with the knife and the plastic split, creating a narrow gap.  Jack gently worked his fingers in, then peeled the plastic open.

What lay within was a beautiful dildo crafted of ice.  Jack held it aloft, presenting it to me.  “There’s a scrach right there,” he said, pointing to an area where the knife had grazed the ice.  It didn’t matter, of course.  Neither of us was expecting it to survive more than a couple hours.

I sat down on the bed, fishing through the top drawer of my nightstand for my bullet.  I had been looking forward to this for so long.  I lay down on the towel, looking up at the ceiling and clutching the tiny bullet as Jack got between my legs.

He began with a little head, licking and lapping at my swollen and very aroused clit.  Not enough for orgasm, of course, just enough to get me sufficiently aroused to take this icy beast.  Which now that I think of it was significantly wider than Jack’s cock.

His breath was hot against my lips, his tongue even hotter.  As his tongue stroked me I felt my temperature rising.  This was short lived.

“Get ready,” he said suddenly.  “This is going to be cold.”  I turned on the bullet and held it on my clit.  But the shock of the ice as it bit at my sex was so great that I dropped it.  It hit the towel on which I lay and buzzed along the bed.  Jack picked it up and handed it to me.

I replaced the humming toy on my aching clit.  I bit my lip as I felt intense cold against my opening.  I thought my heart was going to stop as my pussy opened to accomodate it.  Jack pushed it in a little farther, and then a little farther.  Before I knew it, it was inside me.

Despite my initial discomfort, I gradually became used to having a dildo made of solid ice inside me.  He worked it in and out of me just as he might any sort of object.  I kept a tight grip on the bullet as well, holding it on my engorged bud as Jack pushed me closer and closer to the brink of the coldest climax I had ever enjoyed.  But only one.

When it was all over, and I lay quivering on damp towels, Jack quickly withdrew the ice dildo from my depths.  It was much smaller now, and I realized that most of the wetness pooling beneath my ass was actually water, and not my juices.  He got up from the bed and placed it in the bathroom sink.

I was sad, when I woke the next morning, to find it gone.

-Jill
Picture prompt; no verbal prompt this week

Retro HNT: Birthday Bang

“Birthday Bang”, posted September 30, 2010

In 2010, we posted fifty-two consecutive weeks of pictures at OHNT.  We’re posting them on our blog, one per week.  They can be found here, along with background information and all the comments they received.