Retro HNT: At the top of the stairs
TMI Tuesday: July 17, 2012 – Daring
What are your 50 shades?
a. makes me curious
b. is titillating and sexually arousing
c. that leaves me screaming and/or crying because that’s the way I like it
Here’s where we divert from the theme of vanilla, close-minded squeamishness. Both Jill and I are practiced, expert dirty-talkers, and have little if any reservations when it comes to saying things that could be considered inappropriate. I’ve talked dirty to Jill in church. We’ve had phone sex while she was at work (no students present, obviously). I’ve brought up bedroom scenarios involving people who would probably be very shocked, if not offended, to be involved in such a fashion. In other words, very little is off-limits.
I am naturally dominant.
a. makes me curious
b. is titillating and sexually arousing
c. that leaves me screaming and/or crying because that’s the way I like it
I do enjoy it when Jack or I suck or bite so hard that it leaves a mark. To me, that’s sexy because it tells me that we were so turned on that we got a little carried away. One of my favorite pictures of myself is one Jack took of me where I have matching bruises on each of my breasts. So hot. Sometimes Jack makes me cum so hard that I lose control and I accidentally leave scratch marks on him.
I don’t think I would like to be forced to do anything sexually. For example, while I like rough sex, I am not interested in any sort of rape play. I have definitely explored many new sexual experiences that are outside my previously-adhered-to comfort zone. But I never felt forced in doing so. I prefer to be encouraged and supported to try new things rather than being forced to do so.
I wouldn’t want to be forced to watch Jack have sex with someone else. If and when we have others join us in the bedroom, ideally we would both be active participants, and if I were to just watch at any point, say if I need to take a breather, it would be with consent.
We occasionally include my sisters and my cousins, as well as one of my sisters-in-law, in our dirty fantasy talk. That seems pretty inappropriate in the sense that my family would probably write us both off if they knew. I also like to tell Jack, either verbally or via text message, the things that I would like to do to him, or have him do to me, during family gatherings. We’re so naughty!
Wherein We Finally Weigh in on Fifty Shades of Grey
While on vacation recently, I happened to find myself on the verge of a discussion about sex with a family member who was reading Fifty Shades of Grey. I was lying on a lounge chair in the sun when I overheard my mother-in-law ask my sister-in-law how her book was. “Oh, it’s horrible,” she said indignantly. “It’s so filthy.” At the sound of this very loaded word, I opened my eyes, glancing through my sleepy haze and cheap sunglasses in the direction of the conversation. My sister-in-law held in her hand a copy of the latest literary darling, which also happens to be the latest critical black sheep.
I noticed that my sister-in-law’s tone was not one of reticence, of coy refusal to commit, as one might employ when discussing a work of erotic literature with one’s own mother. No, her tone was one of revulsion, conveying the feelings of someone forced to read something against her will. In a manner of speaking, this was partially true; when asked why she was reading a book that gave her such strong feelings of animosity she said that it was her book club selection, and that she had no choice.
I am a sex blogger, obviously, and as such I presume that I have read more about Fifty Shades of Grey than most of Jill’s family, whose exposure to the book might consist solely of reading a review in Entertainment Weekly. However, I have not read the book itself. When word of this extremely polarizing tome began to permeate Twitter and the sex blogosphere earlier this year, I visited our local library, just out of curiosity, and found that every copy in the county was checked out, with holds in place on all of them for the next three months. I eventually managed to get my hands on a copy, and in the hopes of seeing what all the fuss was about, I read one chapter. However, it took only a couple pages for me to realize that this simply wasn’t the right book for me.
Disappointing, really; anything that brings a decidedly kinky practice like BDSM into the mainstream should be a good thing, right? Perhaps someday an up-and-coming author will write a book that does the same thing for non-monogamy. Unfortunately, I found author E.L. James’ writing style juvenile and unimaginative, with nothing to offer a reader who’s already discovered the likes of Tristan Taormino, Rachel Kramer Bussel, Kristina Wright, Allison Tyler, Thomas Roche, and others.
Yes, I can see why Fifty Shades of Grey has captivated the sensibilities of the vanilla mainstream. It promises the average reader a taste of the taboo, a foray into a forbidden arena they’ve not yet explored. I assume that, for the women who are consuming these books so voraciously, BDSM is far too exotic, dark, even dangerous to be a part of their actual sexual repertoire. The closest women like these come to BDSM is purchasing a pair of pink plastic handcuffs from Spencer’s Gifts, using them once, getting a cramp, and then burying them at the bottom of a nightstand drawer. Let’s face it, the average member of the book’s target audience isn’t a regular BDSM practitioner. Regular BDSM enthusiasts are probably not going to waste their time reading this book.
Judging by the title and cover alone, Fifty Shades of Grey is a lot less salacious than, say, the typical erotic anthology written by real erotic writers and edited by an individual with a healthy attitude about sex. The cover features an admittedly artistic and nicely-lit photo of a necktie. Suggestive, but not too offensive for the delicate sensibilities of the mainstream. By comparison, the erotic books that hold places of honor in our bookcase have covers that feature (much more artistic) photos of women in corsets, women clasping garter belts to stockings, women performing implied oral sex, and lots of naked people locked in the sort of embraces that don’t make the covers of Harlequin-type romance novels. The title alone is less inflammatory than something like Best Women’s Erotica 2012, which might earn you a dirty look as you read it in a public place.
Most importantly – and somehow most perplexingly, even to someone who understands the appeal – Fifty Shades of Grey is tremendously popular, breaking sales records in the U.K. and elsewhere, unseating Harry Potter as the fastest-selling paperback book of all time, and landing its author on Time Magazine’s annual list of influential people. Universal Studios holds the film rights, with Bret Easton Ellis and Angelina Jolie expressing interest in writing and directing, respectively. That means that even if you’re given a dirty look by a conservative type sitting next to you on an airplane as you read it, you can adopt a haughty “Fifty million frustrated housewives can’t be wrong” attitude.
Everytime I see a post by one of my Facebook friends – usually a high school or college acquaintance – gushing about how Fifty Shades of Grey is the hottest thing she’s ever read, my respect for that individual nosedives a bit. Make no mistake, I’m always in favor of people reading rather than languishing in front of a television set watching Jersey Shore. And I certainly have nothing against someone declaring Fifty Shades of Grey a decent time-waster, the sort of throwaway read one might take to the beach, enjoy, and forget about, especially if said someone isn’t very sexually adventurous. But hearing someone declare this book the hottest thing ever makes me want to beg them to read something better, by a writer who’s actually been there.
It’s worth mentioning that these are the same Facebook friends who regularly line up for the midnight premiere of the latest Twilight movie. This is especially noteworthy when one considers the fact that Fifty Shades of Grey started life as Twilight fanfiction. And although no significant resemblance exists between the overrated vampire romance novel series and the overrated BDSM romance novel series, the fact that someone who is sufficiently interested in Twilight to write fan fiction about it under the nom de plume “Snowqueens Icedragon” should be rewarded with a publishing contract is baffling, and not just because I’ve yet to be rewarded with one myself.
One of the things that has gotten under the skin of most of the BDSM community is the fact that James reportedly had no prior first-hand knowledge of or experience with BDSM, and corresponded with a Dom she’d met online as a way of doing research for the book. For this, I hesitate to compare James to Vanilla Ice, if only because when the exaggerations of Vanilla Ice’s hip-hop qualifications came to light his career fizzled, while no one seems to care that James’ BDSM qualifications are spurious.
Technically it shouldn’t matter; to my understanding the author has not claimed that Fifty Shades of Grey is a true story, or that her protagonist Anastasia Steele is meant to represent her; James is an author of fiction telling a story that is presented as such. Whether her research methods consist of first-hand experience, interviews, reference books, or online resources, they should ideally have no bearing on how the book is received provided an entertaining, factually accurate story is told. This brings me to what has raised the ire of most of the BDSM practitioners who’ve voiced an opinion on Fifty Shades of Grey.
Christian Grey, the love interest of Anastasia Steele, practices BDSM as a result of deep-rooted childhood trauma. I can’t say whether the author is attempting to claim that the link between psychological damage and interest in BDSM is an across-the-board constant, but if so it clearly betrays her lack of knowledge on the subject. There is no factual accuracy to the theory that all or even most of those who practice BDSM have such issues; additionally this is an extremely short-sighted sex-negative position that insults not only those who enjoy BDSM, but also those who have suffered a similar trauma. Actually, the sex-negative aspect might help to explain the book’s mainstream popularity.
Additionally, many mainstream literary critics have condemned Fifty Shades of Grey for ostensibly negating feminism, and furthering the false notion that women who submit do so out of a lack of self-respect and the desire to relinquish their free will to a dominant male. This criticism is ridiculous; those who lack self-respect are unlikely to actively seek out fulfillment of their healthy sexual desires in a consensual fashion. Perhaps James should not be blamed for how others interpret her work; having failed to complete more than a single chapter I can’t reliably say whether or not such an attitude was her intent.
As you can tell, my feelings are strong despite the fact that I only made it through eight or nine pages. Actually, it might be more accurate to say that my feelings are strong because I only made it through eight or nine pages. I might have viewed a book written by a more competent author, with better-developed characters and greater substance on offer, more forgivingly than I did this one. At any rate, it’s due to these strong feelings that I wisely opted out of the discussion despite the tractor-beam-like forces drawing me toward it.
I would have gladly discussed the book’s pedestrian roots as fan fiction, E.L. James’ questionable qualifications to write it, and the book’s reputation as an “easy read”, a book designed for those who find the typical romance novel too wordy. I would also have recommended the alternative of Taormino, Bussel, et. al in a heartbeat. But I wasn’t about to get drawn into a debate on the merits of alternative sexual practices lest I inadvertently reveal details about Jill’s and my sex life to individuals from whom we’ve thusfar done a great job hiding them.
I certainly wasn’t going to debate the issue with an individual who’s recently made it clear – only to Jill and I, presumably not to everyone else in the family – that she thinks I’m a sexist pig, a disrespectful chauvinist, and perhaps if I’m willing to read between the lines not good enough to be married to her sister. We have long suspected that certain members of our families would judge us if they knew some of our sexual interests – read more about that here – but the revelation that our suspicions have merit kept me lying silently on that lounge chair.
I considered getting into a BDSM debate with someone who’s reading 50 Shades, insists that female subs have no self-respect, and says the…
— Jack (and Jill) (@jackandjillcpl) June 28, 2012
…book is horrible (which it is), but refuses to stop reading it. Instead I debated politics with my 14-year-old nephew. #ikickedhisass
— Jack (and Jill) (@jackandjillcpl) June 28, 2012
@jackandjillcpl just send to molly’s 50 Shades of me post 😛
— Signs (@DomSigns) June 28, 2012
@DomSigns I actually considered that! What an excellent post. This is just not the sort of person we can have discovering our own blog.
— Jack (and Jill) (@jackandjillcpl) June 28, 2012
At some point, Jill also noticed the book and asked her sister what she thought of it. She was given a diatribe on the protagonist’s lack of self-respect, followed by the clueless argument that those who practice BDSM are fucked up. The entire rant – and believe me, that was a rant – was capped by the following argument-winning checkmate: “It doesn’t matter anyway because the book is just disgusting and the only reason I’m reading it is because I have to.” Frankly, I’m disappointed that her main gripe about the book was a negative judgment about its subject matter. Had her main gripe been “This book is horribly written and whoever gave the author a publishing contract should be fired”, I would have been powerless to resist piling on.
To Jill’s credit, while she didn’t get dragged into the debate – if you can call it that – she did ask her sister why she has to read it. It’s a book club selection, after all, not an English class assignment.
“Well, you have to,” she said. “It’s the selection for this month.”
“What happens if you just don’t read it? If you feel so strongly about it, refuse on principle.”
I believe the discussion died off at this point.
I am always frustrated to learn that intelligent and mature people I respect and care about have bad attitudes about sex. It shouldn’t be surprising, of course; we are conditioned to believe that sex is a necessary evil, something we do for procreation but not for pleasure; or else something that we do for pleasure, but only with strict adherence to conservative guidelines, i.e. behind closed doors; and that daring to talk about it with other adults is akin to urinating in your grandmother’s face. So it doesn’t shock or surprise me, but it does make me sad. Such people could be getting so much more fulfillment out of life if they simply embraced the notion that sex is normal and healthy, and meant to be enjoyed. Maybe that’s the real reason that we don’t talk sex with people unless we’re certain that they have similar attitudes to ours: We just don’t want to be disappointed.
-Jack
Mug o’ Monday
Sinful Sunday: In Low Light
I love the way my new corset blends into the shadows. I love how sultry I feel when I wear it. I hate how empty this bed is. Come join me.
Daniel and the Rape Joke
When I was in high school, some guest speaker – a psychologist, maybe – told my class that men can’t be raped, because men do not have vaginas. When men are forcibly penetrated, it is – or at the time it was – called sexual assault. Imagine telling that to a man who’s wrapped in a blanket, fearfully and shamefully telling police through sobs and trembles what happened to him. “Hey, thanks. It doesn’t hurt anywhere near as bad now as it did when I thought it was rape.”
We have no open dialogue on rape in this country. Recently, comedian Daniel Tosh came under fire for a performance in which he said that rape jokes are always funny, and when heckled by an irate member of the audience, said it would be great if she was gang-raped. When I say “came under fire”, what I mean is that he was vilified by sex-positive bloggers and columnists, and then universally defended by his fellow standup comics via Twitter.
I understand the implication: By muzzling a comedian who dares to resort to material that ventures so far beyond the realm of politically incorrect that it can be termed “inflammatory”, “offensive”, and “an incitement to violence”, we chip further and further away at our collective right to free speech until it is just a momory. I consider myself a fan of standup comedy, and in the past I’ve defended the rights of other comedians to say things that I personally found reprehensible. And I defend Daniel Tosh’s right to do the same, even though the tirade in question does nothing to change my opinion of him as a lackluster comedian who somehow got lucky. Much like Dane Cook.
I understand that a clearly fictitious piece of entertainment such as a movie, a book, or a video game is much different than a performer seeming to exhort – even in jest – a crowd to visit an act of unspeakable violence and hatred upon another person. I get that. And while my opinion on Daniel Tosh’s words remains unchanged, I question how what he did is any different than similar outbursts by Michael Richards and Tracy Morgan, both of which resulted in tremendous backlash.
In 2006 Michael Richards screamed racial epithets and threats at an African American heckler (“Fifty years ago we’d have you upside-down with a fucking fork up your ass!”). In 2011, Tracy Morgan said during a performance that he would “pull out a knife and stab” his gay son if he spoke in an effeminate voice. Acting out of anger, one performer advocates lynching blacks in 1950s America. The other ostensibly normalizes violence against LGBT individuals, presumably for laughs. Both comedians were widely ostracized for their words, and both were eventually driven to apologize.
There is no “It Gets Better” project for rape survivors. Instead, our society trumpets an inexcusable, widespread “blame the victim” policy, and seems far too preoccupied with what a rape victim may have done to make the rapist rape her, or him, than it is with punishing, or even rehabilitating, those who rape. That a woman may be hesitant to report an incident of sexual violence for fear that she will be judged, belittled, or even penalized for having been a victim is a set of circumstances that I cannot bear. When someone reports a car theft, the police don’t suggest that this is what happens when one owns a nice car. Likewise, “What were you wearing?” should never be uttered by a detective investigating a rape.
I don’t necessarily blame Daniel Tosh, at least not primarily; while it’s true that unfunny comedians have no choice but to attempt to shock their audience, I believe that he was influenced the unfeeling reactions of an entitled, male-dominated society that has long stopped pretending to care about the rights of women. And I don’t necessarily blame his audience, who I’m guessing turned against the offended woman in the hopes that Tosh would invite them all backstage after his set. While their actions may have been insensitive and even cruel, they are to an extent victims of an all too unfortunate misogynistic standard that society – American society at least – seems determined to retain. But that doesn’t make them any less culpable.
When Dharun Ravi was found guilty in the Rutgers University webcam case that led to the suicide of his roommate Tyler Clementi, columnist Dan Savage and other gay rights advocates cited blame-shifting, likened Ravi to a scapegoat, and said that society as a whole was complicit in Clementi’s death. While having a sexual encounter broadcast via webcam – and being forcefully outed at the same time – was a horrible violation, it was likely a lifetime of adversity that drove Clementi to suicide. The point made by Savage, et. al was that by making an example of Ravi, society could alleviate its own guilt. To an extent, I get the same sense from Tosh’s rape joke. Yes, he said something that I believe transcends poor taste. But he was emboldened to do so by a society that apparently considers rape no big deal.
In the wake of the Tracy Morgan incident, Louis CK, a comedian I highly respect, defended Morgan and lamented the fact that by attacking him, LGBT individuals squandered an opportunity to open a dialogue not only on LGBT issues, but also traditional views of masculinity. He’s right; while offended parties are within their rights to voice their opinion of a comedian – or any artist – and his or her material, engaging in a sensible dialogue will benefit society in the long run as it may reshape long-held attitudes in need of changing. I’m not optimistic, but I hope that Daniel Tosh’s rape joke will not result in a squandered opportunity.
Update, 4.27.20: Obviously I no longer respect Louis CK. Anyone who still does following the numerous accusations of sexual misconduct against women (and the comedian’s subsequent admission thereof) probably stopped reading this post a couple paragraphs in.
Not long before this post was written and published, I’d mentioned my enjoyment of Louis CK’s comedy to a friend, who in an attempt to dissuade me said she’d “heard things” about him but wouldn’t elaborate as to the specifics. As she was a woman of color, I assumed she was talking about his casual use of the N-word – or various other words that straight white guys shouldn’t want to say – as part of his edgy persona, and I’m sorry to say I largely disregarded her concerns as I found his comedy relatable, especially what he had to say about parenting.
I could have googled it, but honestly I had no idea that it was anything more alarming than that. (I admittedly did find CK’s use of such language problematic, just not enough to abandon him.) Granted, I was well aware that masturbation made up as much of his comedy as it does my tweets, but the thought that he was the kind of malformed, inadequate person who needed to inflict himself on women by forcing them to watch? No way. It wouldn’t have occurred to me in a million years.
Except of course it should have occurred to me because less than a year earlier his F/X show Louie featured a scene wherein the comedian faced off against an anti-masturbation activist on a panel discussion show about the topic. Exasperated by her puritanical views, he tells her that masturbation keeps him sane, and enables him to be a good person. “I’m a good father,” he says. “I recycle and I masturbate. And I’m proud of it. And God’s happy.” All rational, salient points with which I certainly can’t find fault.
He continues: “And later I’m going to masturbate, and I’m going to think about you, and there’s nothing you can do about it.” Cue needle scratch. I get feeling threatened by someone who believes that something that makes you happy, that makes you you, is morally wrong. I get wanting to push back against them. But when you wag your dick in their face, literally or figuratively, that’s when I get off the bus.
Because is it me, or does telling someone something like that come off as assault? Not physical assault, obviously, but anyone who gives the subject any considerable thought must realize that lack of physical contact doesn’t preclude trauma. It’s not unlike the tweets I occasionally see wherein people call out kinksters for, say, performing an elaborate D/s routine on a crowded subway car; if you involve someone in your sex life who hasn’t consented to be a part of it, you are potentially doing harm to that person. And as opposed as I am to the anti-masturbation activist’s position that self-pleasure is harmful – and I recognize that she is a fictional character played by an actor – she didn’t deserve to be harmed. As CK said moments earlier, nobody gets hurt by masturbation. Which is ironic considering the amount of people Louie CK hurt by masturbation.
I’m at a point in my life where I am actively trying to do better. Not necessarily better than other people, just better than I was the day before, or in this case several years before. And part of doing better involves not making excuses for people who do shitty things.
Also, I should point out that the guest speaker to whom I refer in the second paragraph was wrong: Men sometimes have vaginas. Granted, I’ll wager that his ignorance stemmed less from willful transphobia and more from ignorance; it was 1993 or 1994, and though I don’t wish to speak for all cisgender people, I can say with complete candor that as a cisgender teenager who thought he knew everything about sex, I knew little if anything about what being transgender meant.
Formspring Friday: Satisfaction
On a scale of 0 to 10, how satisfied are you with your sex life?
We wrote and scheduled this post on July 2nd. By the time it is published on July 13th, we will have been on a road trip with Jack’s parents for almost a week. We imagine that having them in close quarters for so long will be hell on our sex life, and would probably skew our answer. Therefore we are opting to write it now, in the comfort of our own home, and in the afterglow of really hot sex.
Rather than posting two separate answers to this question, we discussed it and discovered that our feelings are about the same. On a scale of 0 to 10, we both consider ourselves about an 8. Why not a ten? Well, we are realists. While it’s true that we are very satisfied with our sex life, we know that there is always room for improvement, and we strive constantly to do better.
Also, we can’t always have sex as often as we’d like. Various obligations including work and family interfere with our dreams of having sex twelve hours a day and sleeping the other twelve. If we could live that kind of life, that would take us up to 9.5 easily. But we really have little reason to complain. Our desires are regularly indulged, most of our (reasonable) fantasies are fulfilled, and we have pretty much everything we require to truly be sexually satisfied.
Still, there are always going to be new things we want to try, including toys, positions, locations, and people. To some extent these things act as motivation, and keep us wanting more. Thus we remain focused and not complacent. Sexually, we are always on the move.
Despite the joke I made above, I don’t know that anything would really elevate us above an 8. Our attitudes toward sex mean we’re always grounded in reality, and we realize that perfection is hardly ever achievable.
If you want to ask us anything, drop us a line on Formspring, or use the handy Formspring widget on the right-hand side of our blog. We like sexy questions! To see who else participated this week, visit Twitter and search for #FormspringFriday!
Flash Fiction Friday: The Main Course
Behind the Scenes
I wrote this story in about twenty minutes on Wednesday evening. The prompt photo didn’t exactly speak to me; I found myself scrambling to come up with an idea as I didn’t think I would have an internet connection at all on Thursday. Even when the idea came to me I was convinced that it was the least unique idea imaginable. Still, I went with it. I note that it’s a bit unclear as to what exactly is occurring in my story, though that is due to the fact that the picture itself is unclear. Are they going to actually cannibalize the woman on the table? Or are they, as is stated in the final line, planning to perform cunnilingus on her? If so, what’s with the silverware?
Among the parameters for this week’s Flash Fiction Friday challenge was a word range of 145-149. I always find such a range particularly challenging; anyone can write a story that is 149 words or less, but it takes precision to write a story that must fall within such a tight bracket. Additionally, this week’s required word was “…insinuate…” Not “…insinuation…” or even “…insinuated…” Unlike most weeks, I remembered to include the required word, but found it very difficult to do so. The verbiage about diners and critics being “known to insinuate” was a direct result of the required tense; had the word been “…insinuated…” I could have gone with “diners and critics alike insinuated…”
I realize that the brick structure in the background of the photo is clearly a fireplace, but I chose to make it a pizza oven. Despite the fact that no restaurant that I know of has a pizza oven in a location other than the kitchen, but I thought it drove home the point that this is a very unusual restaurant, and not some sort of BDSM dungeon. Incidentally, “A Very Unusual Restaurant” was the original title of this story.
Deleted Scenes
Despite my story’s lack of substance, I found the 149-word maximum a bit limiting, and because of this I had to trim about fifteen words to make the limit. Additionally, while the story was still underway I pre-emptively excised the following passage in order to make room for the second paragraph containing the required word.
They stared at the empty oak tabletop, anticipating their feast. One of the women impatiently tapped her silverware against the surface. The service wasn’t slow; on the contrary, their waiter was very attentive. But their anticipation was great.
Soundtrack
As Billy Joel is one of her favorite artists, Jill will probably never forgive me for going with “Scenes From an Italian Restaurant”. It was the first song that came to mind.
Programming Note
We’ll be out of town next week, and may or may not have internet access. While I will make every effort to participate in Flash Fiction Friday on July 20, if we don’t it’s because we’re unable, not because we’ve in any way lost interest in the meme.
The Naughty Hangout: Pop!
Jack says that my nipple qualifies for “Sharp” as well.
Go see who else is being naughty this week!
-Jill





























