Lurker Appreciation Day
Today is the sixth annual Love Our Lurkers. LOL is an occasion to publicly embrace those of you who lurk; that is to say, those of you who read a blog, forum or other online community but don’t actively participate. Those who lurk at this blog – and I suspect that there are many based on our stats – undoubtedly laugh at our TMI Tuesday answers, perv the latest pictures of Jill’s ass, admire – or criticize – my flash fiction, and read about whatever legislation some religious nut has proposed in the name of family values, and about my opinion thereof; and then leave without commenting. Or perhaps they just perv the latest picture of Jill’s ass and leave.
We don’t mind, as Jill and I are happy just to be able to express ourselves in such a forum and any appreciation anyone sees fit to voice for our efforts is icing on the proverbial cake. That being said, while we do this mainly for us, few things are more thrilling than to know that people are enjoying our efforts. This flatters us immensely, and certainly inspires us to continue sharing more of ourselves with all of you. When our blog petered out in summer 2010, had we half the audience of loyal followers that we have today, perhaps we would have been motivated to continue blogging, knowing that people might miss us if we were gone.
If you regularly stop by for any reason but have never left a comment – or even if you regularly do or if this is your first visit – we would love to hear from you. No need to write more than you’re comfortable with or more than you have time for; just a quick hello would suffice, though we wouldn’t complain if you wanted to share a few words about what brings you by, how you found us or what you like about the blog. We would love to know who’s reading our stuff and we appreciate the interaction. Admittedly we could stand to do a better job replying to comments, something we’ve both neglected of late.
If you’re a lurker and absolutely dread the idea of leaving a comment, that’s fine. We appreciate you nonetheless, and we hope you enjoy what you find here. Have you seen today’s HNT picture? It’s a nice follow up to the October 27th picture and we think you’ll like it.
HNT: Working Out
My Daughter the Cockblocker; or Why Jack Can’t Jack Off
TMI Tuesday: Conspicuous Luxury
I’m The ‘Scary’ Model In That Awful Ashley Madison Ad

My name is Jacqueline and I am the model seen on the Ashley Madison ad that was recently published in the New York Metro newspaper.I am the owner and model of the BBW website www.juicyjackie.com. It is tailored to the tastes of those that love big women, their curves, rolls and all the plush softness that comes with being fat.Years ago, before my modeling career began in earnest, a photographer friend of mine arranged an informal photo session. I was under the impression at the time that people purchasing these photos from the photographer would be doing so for their own personal use. I had no idea that the photographer would endeavor to sell the photos to corporations and/or stock photo companies, who would then go on, repeatedly, to use them in rude and mocking ways.I am mortified that my image and likeness would be used as advertisement for two things I am so vehemently against: namely cheating and, to an even greater extent, body shaming.I find the very idea that there exists a business based solely around the facilitation of infidelity appalling. The fact that they are now suggesting that a person’s partner not fitting their ideal body size/shape, entitles that person to ‘shop around’ is disgusting.There is an enormous problem in this world in regards to female body shaming, and not solely in regard to fat women, but all women. A size 2 woman who sees this ad sees the message: “If I don’t stay small, he will cheat”. A size 12 woman might see this ad and think “if I don’t lose 30lbs, he will cheat”. A size 32 woman could see this ad, and feel “I will never find love”. It’s horrific. Not all women are necessarily insecure, but it’s no secret that body insecurity is endemic, regardless of size. This kind of message is extremely damaging to self worth. Eating disorders may have lost their place in the media spotlight, but continue to effect people of all ages, especially teens. This sort of behavior can easily be triggered from the careless cruelty of advertisements like the one in question.As has been widely reported, teens are committing suicide in shocking numbers all over the world as direct result of this sort of shaming ridicule. Be it directed at race, size, sexual orientation or anything, bullying is a vicious force in this world. Contributing to this widespread and creeping depression by suggesting, blatantly and without pretense, that fat people are patently undeserving of love and loyalty is repulsive. It is incumbent upon advertisers, and society at large, to act responsibly before foisting something like this onto the world.It’s bad enough that a business exists that encourages and profits from cheaters, but, worse still, that they have the gall to blame a woman’s body on the act, rather than the man who is incapable of commitment and loyalty. It exists in the same school of thought in which a rapist blames a woman’s outfit for his crime.I am a size 32. I am beautiful. I think women of all sizes are beautiful. Beauty is not and has never been one-size-fits-all. I do not appreciate my image being used, without notice or permission, to tell women I have never met otherwise.Update: After Jacqueline’s message went live, Jezebel received this response from Ashley Madison founder and CEO Noel Biderman:The best thing that could’ve happened to this woman is that we used her in our ad. Despite what she may want you to think, she is reaping the press for her own pornography website. She took these pictures and signed the release knowing that they were not just for ‘personal use.’ However, if she can get great publicity from this, all the power to her.
Sunday Stealing: The Madness Meme, Part 1
1. Have you ever licked the back of a CD to try to get it to work? No. In fact, I’ve never actually heard of anyone doing this. Is this really a dirty-or-scratched-CD remedy? Generally speaking if I have a CD that doesn’t play – not that I’ve actually handled a CD in many years – I take a clean cloth and wipe from the center ring outward.
Jill’s Answers
1. Have you ever licked the back of a CD to try to get it to work? Yes, I have. I did it once in order to clean the surface, but it didn’t work and thereafter I used a damp tissue.
Flash Fiction Friday: Art Gallery
(Image source unknown but was titled “Entertainment Center”)
HNT: Hint of Red
Wisconsin Bill Makes Watching Porn Reason to Revoke Teacher’s License
Wisconsin’s state Assembly has passed a bill that would make watching pornography at work reason to revoke an educator’s license.The bill passed through the state Senate last month, and fortifies a current policy that has permitted teachers watching pornography on school district computers to relocate and teach at another school district without having the reason publicized, The Sheboygan Press reports.Currently, a law exists that permits license revocation for incompetency or immoral conduct, defined as behavior that endangers the health, safety, welfare or education of a student. The new provision would add to “immoral conduct” the intentional use of school equipment to “download, view or distribute pornographic material in violation of the educational agency’s policy.”The bill also calls for publicly posting the names of educators who are investigated for violating the policy on the school’s website.“Parents have every reason to expect their child’s school building will be free from pornography, and school leaders have a responsibility to keep our schools safe,” Republican state Rep. Steve Kestell said in a statement after the Senate passed the bill last month. “This legislation will make it easier for local school leaders to provide a safe environment.”Kestell and Republican state Sen. Luther Olsen co-authored the bill, which now heads to Gov. Scott Walker for consideration.The legislation was drafted in response to several cases in which school districts were unaware of an educator’s past misconduct in another district or were faced with lawsuits by educators who were dismissed for watching pornography in school.In May, the Wisconsin State Journal reported that the Middleton-Cross Plains School Board had spent around $300,000 over the course of a year while battling a complaint by former science teacher Andrew Harris, who was fired for viewing pornography at school. Seven other high school staff members and one administrator were also investigated and disciplined for similar misconducts.Kestell and Olsen’s bill doesn’t come without costs. The submitted fiscal estimates show that the new provision would increase costs that would not likely be absorbed within current budgets.While the legislators note that it’s unclear whether the added clause would lead to more reporting by school administrators, the launch of an investigation by the state superintendent would cost the education department $350 for docketing a hearing into a complaint and $135 per hour for pre-hearing conferences, hearings, research, writing and travel costs.The state would also likely have to hire experts to determine and define at those hearings what is considered pornographic material.
The bill also calls for publicly posting the names of educators who are investigated for violating the policy on the school’s website.







